AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A landlord initially seeking compensation of $102,270 for theft and repair costs following a break-in at a vacant commercial property was awarded $45,724 after a protracted insurance dispute with AIG Australia.
The issue revolved around discrepancies over a premium for an unoccupied building.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, reducing the payout by $56,546. This amount corresponds to the difference the landlord would have owed AIG in premiums to insure a building unoccupied for more than 90 consecutive days - an arrangement the landlord neglected, despite receiving clear directives from a broker.
The landlord, with guidance from their broker, had filed a claim last July after criminals gained access through a leased security gate, prompting AIG to refuse the claim due to the structure’s vacant status, which wasn't covered under the policy.
Prior to the unfortunate event, the broker had made the building owner and managing agent aware of the need to refresh AIG of the vacant situation, potentially affecting claims, and the possibility of acquiring extra coverage by adjusting the premium.
Despite the advice, the owner failed to take action, leading to AIG being notified about the vacancy only post-theft. AFCA indicated that AIG would likely have underwritten the unoccupancy risk had they been told, and determined it fair to authorize the claim - factoring in the supplemental premium and other conditions like an excess charge.
Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act became pivotal, with AFCA stating that the breach pertained to not informing the insurer of the decision to leave the property vacant beyond 90 days without seeking written permission - not merely the fact that the premises were left empty.
An AFCA official explained, “I am not of the view that the complainant’s failure to request the insurer’s written consent ... can reasonably be regarded as being capable of causing or contributing to the malicious damage and theft event.”
They emphasized, “The insurer cannot refuse to pay the claim by reason only of the post-contractual act, that is, by reason only of the complainant’s failure to seek its written consent. The insurer is, however, entitled to reduce its liability to the extent that it has been prejudiced.”
AFCA specified that AIG had not proved the extent of its disadvantage equaled its ability to completely dismiss its liability under the policy. Instead, AFCA accepted that the liability compared to the additional premium deemed appropriate if the vacancy had been disclosed.
Arguments suggesting partial occupancy, due to daily visits from a property manager and maintenance by contractors, were rejected, as was the claim that it was unjust to deny coverage because the theft transpired over a weekend when the premises would be unoccupied even if tenanted.
This information originally featured in an article in Insurance News Magazine.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Lithium-ion batteries are now part of everyday trade work. They power cordless tools, site lighting, testing equipment, drones, portable power stations and, for some electricians and solar installers, the systems being installed for customers. A fresh insurance industry analysis has again highlighted why this technology is not just a convenience issue, but a serious risk management issue for businesses. - read more
Telstra has opened a dedicated compensation pathway for small businesses affected by last week’s nationwide mobile and data outage, after disruptions left some operators unable to take payments, answer calls or access essential online systems. For tradespeople, the story is more than a telco customer service issue. It is a timely reminder that a business can lose income even when the tools are safe, the ute is ready and the job book is full. - read more
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision is a timely warning for trade businesses that rely on tools, trailers and mobile equipment every day. The dispute centred on a business that had tools and a trailer stolen from a worksite, then challenged the insurer’s payout after discovering the claim was limited by the portable items section of the policy. - read more
Running a small trade business in Australia involves various risks, from accidental property damage to unexpected injuries on the job. These unforeseen events can lead to significant financial losses, which might be challenging for smaller enterprises to absorb. That's where comprehensive insurance comes into play. - read more
Tradespeople in Australia rely heavily on their tools and equipment to get the job done. Whether you are a carpenter, electrician, plumber, or any other type of tradesperson, your tools are essential to your daily operations. - read more
In Australia, tradies are the backbone of many local communities, providing essential services in fields such as construction, plumbing, electrical work, and more. These skilled professionals often operate their own businesses or work as contractors, making financial stability paramount. - read more
Knowledgebase
Incontestability Clause: A provision in a life insurance policy that prevents the insurer from voiding coverage due to a misstatement by the insured after a certain period.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.