AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A landlord initially seeking compensation of $102,270 for theft and repair costs following a break-in at a vacant commercial property was awarded $45,724 after a protracted insurance dispute with AIG Australia.
The issue revolved around discrepancies over a premium for an unoccupied building.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, reducing the payout by $56,546. This amount corresponds to the difference the landlord would have owed AIG in premiums to insure a building unoccupied for more than 90 consecutive days - an arrangement the landlord neglected, despite receiving clear directives from a broker.
The landlord, with guidance from their broker, had filed a claim last July after criminals gained access through a leased security gate, prompting AIG to refuse the claim due to the structure’s vacant status, which wasn't covered under the policy.
Prior to the unfortunate event, the broker had made the building owner and managing agent aware of the need to refresh AIG of the vacant situation, potentially affecting claims, and the possibility of acquiring extra coverage by adjusting the premium.
Despite the advice, the owner failed to take action, leading to AIG being notified about the vacancy only post-theft. AFCA indicated that AIG would likely have underwritten the unoccupancy risk had they been told, and determined it fair to authorize the claim - factoring in the supplemental premium and other conditions like an excess charge.
Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act became pivotal, with AFCA stating that the breach pertained to not informing the insurer of the decision to leave the property vacant beyond 90 days without seeking written permission - not merely the fact that the premises were left empty.
An AFCA official explained, “I am not of the view that the complainant’s failure to request the insurer’s written consent ... can reasonably be regarded as being capable of causing or contributing to the malicious damage and theft event.”
They emphasized, “The insurer cannot refuse to pay the claim by reason only of the post-contractual act, that is, by reason only of the complainant’s failure to seek its written consent. The insurer is, however, entitled to reduce its liability to the extent that it has been prejudiced.”
AFCA specified that AIG had not proved the extent of its disadvantage equaled its ability to completely dismiss its liability under the policy. Instead, AFCA accepted that the liability compared to the additional premium deemed appropriate if the vacancy had been disclosed.
Arguments suggesting partial occupancy, due to daily visits from a property manager and maintenance by contractors, were rejected, as was the claim that it was unjust to deny coverage because the theft transpired over a weekend when the premises would be unoccupied even if tenanted.
This information originally featured in an article in Insurance News Magazine.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian insurance industry is currently grappling with a complex landscape marked by escalating premiums and declining profits. This trend is largely attributed to the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters, coupled with rising operational costs. - read more
Despite facing a volatile risk environment, Australia's non-life insurance sector has demonstrated remarkable resilience, with leading insurers reporting substantial revenue growth. According to AM Best's recent analysis, the top 10 non-life insurers in Australia collectively achieved nearly $46 billion in insurance services revenue in the latest fiscal year, marking an 11.1% increase from the previous period. - read more
Budget Direct has been honored with the prestigious 'Insurer of the Year' title in the 2026 Finder Provider of the Year Awards, solidifying its position as a leading choice for Australian consumers seeking value and reliable coverage. This accolade is part of a broader recognition, with Budget Direct securing a total of five major awards, the highest number for any provider in this year's competition. - read more
Specialized insurance for tradespeople is a form of tailored insurance coverage designed specifically to meet the unique needs and risks that professionals in various trades encounter. This includes trades such as electricians, plumbers, carpenters, and other similar occupations. - read more
In Australia, a 'tradie' is a commonly used term for someone working in the trades, such as plumbers, electricians, builders, or carpenters. Tradies play a vital role in maintaining and improving our homes, businesses, and infrastructure. - read more
Tradespeople in Australia rely heavily on their tools and equipment to get the job done. Whether you are a carpenter, electrician, plumber, or any other type of tradesperson, your tools are essential to your daily operations. - read more
Knowledgebase
Premium: The amount paid for an insurance policy, usually on a regular basis, to maintain coverage.
