AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
AIG Insurance Tangle Over Vacant Property Break-In Unravels
1
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A landlord initially seeking compensation of $102,270 for theft and repair costs following a break-in at a vacant commercial property was awarded $45,724 after a protracted insurance dispute with AIG Australia.
The issue revolved around discrepancies over a premium for an unoccupied building.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, reducing the payout by $56,546. This amount corresponds to the difference the landlord would have owed AIG in premiums to insure a building unoccupied for more than 90 consecutive days - an arrangement the landlord neglected, despite receiving clear directives from a broker.
The landlord, with guidance from their broker, had filed a claim last July after criminals gained access through a leased security gate, prompting AIG to refuse the claim due to the structure’s vacant status, which wasn't covered under the policy.
Prior to the unfortunate event, the broker had made the building owner and managing agent aware of the need to refresh AIG of the vacant situation, potentially affecting claims, and the possibility of acquiring extra coverage by adjusting the premium.
Despite the advice, the owner failed to take action, leading to AIG being notified about the vacancy only post-theft. AFCA indicated that AIG would likely have underwritten the unoccupancy risk had they been told, and determined it fair to authorize the claim - factoring in the supplemental premium and other conditions like an excess charge.
Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act became pivotal, with AFCA stating that the breach pertained to not informing the insurer of the decision to leave the property vacant beyond 90 days without seeking written permission - not merely the fact that the premises were left empty.
An AFCA official explained, “I am not of the view that the complainant’s failure to request the insurer’s written consent ... can reasonably be regarded as being capable of causing or contributing to the malicious damage and theft event.”
They emphasized, “The insurer cannot refuse to pay the claim by reason only of the post-contractual act, that is, by reason only of the complainant’s failure to seek its written consent. The insurer is, however, entitled to reduce its liability to the extent that it has been prejudiced.”
AFCA specified that AIG had not proved the extent of its disadvantage equaled its ability to completely dismiss its liability under the policy. Instead, AFCA accepted that the liability compared to the additional premium deemed appropriate if the vacancy had been disclosed.
Arguments suggesting partial occupancy, due to daily visits from a property manager and maintenance by contractors, were rejected, as was the claim that it was unjust to deny coverage because the theft transpired over a weekend when the premises would be unoccupied even if tenanted.
This information originally featured in an article in Insurance News Magazine.
Published:Friday, 1st Nov 2024 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
In recent developments within the Australian construction insurance sector, tradies are witnessing a notable decrease in premium rates. This trend is largely attributed to heightened competition among insurers, leading to more affordable coverage options for professionals in the trades industry. - read more
The Australian construction industry is currently grappling with escalating costs, compelling tradies to reevaluate their insurance strategies to effectively manage increased financial risks. Factors such as supply chain disruptions, inflation, and labour shortages have collectively contributed to a significant rise in overall construction expenses. - read more
In a significant regulatory development, registered building practitioners in New South Wales (NSW) are now required to secure professional indemnity (PI) insurance by July 1, 2026. This mandate, stemming from the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2021, underscores the importance of comprehensive risk management for tradies operating within the state. - read more
Comprehensive insurance is a type of coverage that protects your trade business from various risks and unforeseen events. It typically includes an array of policies that cover different aspects of your business operations. - read more
Running a trade business in Australia comes with its own set of unique challenges and risks. Whether you're an electrician, plumber, builder, or any other type of tradesperson, protecting your livelihood is crucial. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of cover that protects businesses and their owners from the financial risks of liabilities that may occur due to damage or injury to a third party. For tradies in Australia, this insurance is crucial due to the nature of their work environment. Working on various sites and handling different tasks increases the likelihood of accidents happening, which makes this type of insurance not only relevant but essential. - read more
Dictionary
Endorsement
noun
An amendment or addition to an existing insurance policy that changes the terms or scope of the original policy.
