Allianz's Payout Reduction Approved in Car Claim Dispute

5

The case involves a claimant who purchased a 2013 Range Rover Dynamic for $41,750 from a private seller on June 2nd of the previous year. Tragically, the vehicle caught fire and was deemed a total loss on the same day he picked it up.

Believing his new car was covered, the man submitted a claim to Allianz for the agreed value of $105,950, under a policy initiated the day of the incident. Initially, Allianz seemed to agree to the settlement amount; however, an investigation revealed a discrepancy in the model description.

The claimant had listed his vehicle as the more luxurious and costly 2013 Range Rover Autobiography MY14.5 model when, in fact, it was a Range Rover Dynamic. This misdescription resulted in an overinflated insured value.

As a result, Allianz recalculated the vehicle's worth and offered to settle the claim for a revised value of $66,630. After deducting remaining premiums and excess, the final payout amounted to $58,979.

The vehicle owner argued that he made an "innocent misrepresentation" because the insurer’s website provided a model with an outdated engine when he searched using his car's registration. He claimed he selected the Autobiography MY14.5 model since it had a similar engine type.

"I opted for the only model with my engine type and MY14.5 badging," the man explained to the complaints authority. "The website's labeling was incorrect and misled me."

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority concluded that while the policyholder's situation was understandable, it did not excuse the inaccurate car description, which breached policy terms.

"I acknowledge the complainant's challenge in finding his exact car model on the insurer's online policy platform," an AFCA ombudsman commented. "However, this does not justify misrepresenting the car's specification."

The AFCA stressed the importance of accurate car descriptions in insurance agreements, advising policyholders to make additional inquiries if unable to find the right model online.

This ruling reinforces Allianz's right to adjust the settlement based on a common law precedent, affirming the fairness of the insurer’s reduced offer. The case highlights the critical nature of precise data input when setting up insurance policies.

For further insights, the original article can be found on the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's website.

Published:Thursday, 5th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Car Theft Claims Skyrocket, Raising Insurance Concerns 24 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia has unveiled substantial data revealing that the expense related to vehicle theft claims has almost doubled since 2015. Last year, the industry handled $428 million in claims, signaling a stark increase from $218 million a decade ago. The data comes from Insurance Statistics Australia, which has adjusted historic dollar values for inflation, highlighting an urgent trend in rising car crime claims. - read more

Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE 21 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled in favour of QBE Insurance in a case where an uninsured driver attempted to secure compensation following a collision involving a fire truck. The incident occurred when the QBE-insured driver paused at an intersection to allow a fire truck to pass, leading to the uninsured driver impacting their vehicle. - read more

Consumer Advocacy Calls for $250 Million Annual Insurer Contribution Fund 18 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori A prominent consumer advocacy group, the Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby (ACIL), is advocating for insurers to contribute $250 million annually to support disaster risk mitigation, as well as the affordability and availability of insurance coverage. This initiative seeks to address what the organization describes as an escalating crisis within the insurance industry. - read more