Insurer Ordered to Cover Restaurant Arson Despite Director's Unrevealed Criminal Record

0

The restaurant's sole director contended the omission was unintentional and emphasised his efforts toward rehabilitation. He proposed to pay any additional premiums necessitated by his past, seeking a fair resolution to his claim. However, QBE maintained that knowledge of his convictions would have impacted their decision to provide coverage from the outset.

AFCA examined the claim documentation, highlighting that QBE had not substantiated its stance. It noted the absence of conclusive evidence of what specific inquiries were made during the policy's initiation, given the broker used an electronic interface linked to QBE's systems. Critically, QBE failed to furnish definitive proof of the questions asked, nor did it provide screenshots of the policy initiation process.

The crux of AFCA's decision rested on the ambiguity of the questions. One inquiry appeared specific to the company's criminal history, rather than its director. Though QBE suggested a duty for directors to disclose past convictions, AFCA's ombudsman determined the insurer did not demonstrate an adequate breach of disclosure obligations by the insured company.

As a result, AFCA concluded that QBE could not justifiably void the policy or deny the claim. The insurer is mandated to reinstate coverage and conduct any additional evaluations required to settle the claim under the policy's terms, all within 28 days of the complainant's acknowledgment of this determination.

This decision underscores the complexities surrounding disclosure obligations in insurance contracts and the critical need for insurers to clearly document and validate their inquiries during the underwriting process.

Published:Thursday, 12th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ASIC Challenges Federal Court's 'Fair Term' Ruling 09 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is appealing a Federal Court decision regarding the wording of a 'pre-existing condition' clause in certain HCF Life insurance products. The court previously determined that while the wording had the potential to mislead consumers, it did not constitute an unfair contract term under the current laws set out in the ASIC Act 2001. - read more

ICA Advocates for Strata Law Reform in the ACT to Enhance Building Management 08 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) is urging the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) to adopt strata transparency regulations, aiming to enhance oversight of building repairs and maintenance by owners’ committees. This call was made during a parliamentary inquiry, where the ICA pushed for measures akin to recent legislative changes in New South Wales. - read more

Tasmanian Government Insurance Proposal Faces Industry Backlash 07 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Tasmanian government's recent proposal to establish a state-run insurance entity has drawn significant criticism from key players in the insurance industry. The plan, spearheaded by Premier Jeremy Rockliff, aims to expand the Motor Accidents Insurance Board into a broader service named TasInsure, offering products including home and contents insurance, small business coverage, and more. The RACT, a major player in Tasmania's insurance sector, expressed considerable concern, labelling the initiative as a simplistic answer to complex problems. - read more